A Short Summary ExcerptElizabeth George has a History of Making False Allegations and False Claims Against Mr. Perrot
Based on true events. Some portions subject to change.
Elizabeth George, who is now known as Elizabeth Baker, has a history of making false allegations and false claims against me and manipulating the police and the courts for her own benefit. She has also, in the past, demonstrated that she is mentally unstable. Here are but a few examples which will be covered in much greater detail in my upcoming book, Stratagems of the Devil: How Florida Prosecutors Created and Used Some of the Most Dangerous MeToo False Accusers in the World:
In June of 1986 I took Elizabeth to Pennsylvania to see her grandmother who was dying in the hospital. Elizabeth's grandmother had raised her when her own birth mother walked out of the hospital leaving Beth behind after Beth was born.
Pursuant to Elizabeth's own handwritten notes from her Calendar Diary:
June 8, 1986, "Went to Pa., saw grandma-real awful."June 9, 1986, "We went to Pa., Grandma very very bad.June 15-16, 1986, "Tried to kill myself. Gary stayed up with me all night."
The reason Elizabeth tried to kill herself is because she was very, very distraught over her grandmother who died just before Beth tried to kill herself or just after. I should have known
then that Elizabeth had some serious mental problems. But what was I to do, divorce my wife? Another example of Elizabeth's mental instability will be covered in Stratagems of the Devil.
March 10, 1993
On March 10, 1993 Elizabeth took out a restraining order against me only to let it voluntarily expire on March 26, 1993. Elizabeth never mentioned in her application for this restraining order that I had ever, at any time, sexually assaulted her. Interestingly enough, it was after prosecutors contacted her in January, 1996 that Elizabeth swore, under oath, that I raped her all through our marriage and raped her on March 23, 1993, only to later to swear that the date was March 21, 1993.
If I had raped Elizabeth all through our marriage as she later claimed in 1996, then why would she not use these rapes throughout our marriage as a basis to obtain this March 10, 1993 restraining order? And if she was raped on March 21 or 23, 1993 as she claimed, then why would she let this restraining order voluntarily expire just days later?
The reason is simple, Elizabeth is a liar and false accuser.
Additionally, when I deposed Elizabeth in 2018 I went through each of the examples listed herein, and questioned her extensively, as to if she ever reported to any law enforcement officer, detective, court personnel, or anyone else in an official capacity or wrote in any report or paper filed in any court that I had ever, at any time, raped her. She conceded she told no law enforcement or court personnel and never mentioned being raped in any paper she filed in court. But when Elizabeth was deposed in 1996 during my criminal proceedings when I was accused of raping Juanita Meek, Elizabeth claimed she spoke "informally" to a detective John Kenny and told him that I raped her. When she was asked when she spoke to Kenny she stated she could not recall. When pressed further she changed her answer and stated she spoke to Kenny within a week or two of the March, 1993 rape. Perplexingly Kenny made no report.
During my 1993 divorce proceedings, Mark Lipinski my attorney, informed me that Elizabeth was having sex with Detective John Kenny. Puzzling, the State never named John Kenny as a witness in my 1996 criminal trial to support the testimony of Elizabeth George. I guess bedfellows make poor witnesses when one of them is a married detective and engaging in sexual relations with a supposed victim in violation of department policy. Moreover, it defies logic for a detective to learn of an alleged sexual assault and not report it or do anything about it, regardless of whether the detective is fucking the alleged victim.
The truth of the matter is this: Elizabeth was once again lying. She was not raped in March of 1993 or at any time during my marriage to her and, while she may have been fucking John Kenny, she simply could not have told him of an incident that never occurred which is why the State never named Kenny as a witness.
Sometimes life just sucks the jelly right out of your donut.
March 26, 1993
It was also on March 26, 1993, the same day that Elizabeth let the restraining order voluntarily expire, that she called me at my residence and left a message on my answering machine that she needed to speak with me. After getting a busy signal I drove over to Beth's apartment, which was only ten minutes away from my house, to speak with her. Elizabeth damn near got me killed that night when police stopped me with their guns drawn and pointed at me. It was a good thing I was dressed in a sport coat and wearing a tie.
Here is what the official police report stated, per what Elizabeth told police:
Mr. Perrot has called his wife (whom he is separated from) several times this evening. Mrs. Perrot states that he became upset when she would not spend the night with him. She states he told her on the phone he would be coming over during the night to shoot out the tires on her car. When she saw him enter the parking lot she called MCSO.
This is the police investigative report written by Deputy Olmstead of the Manatee County Sheriff's Department:
Crime scene: Saddle Creek Apts. Located at 5400 W. 26th St. Apt. H116
INVESTIGATION: I was dispatched to the above location in ref to a man armed with an unk type handgun. Upon my arrival I was advised by dispatch that the suspect was leaving in a white Camaro. I observed the suspect leaving and conducted a traffic stop on him. Myself, Dep Whitehead and Sgt Wooten got the suspect out of the vehicle. Dep Whitehead obtained the suspects ID while Sgt Wooten checked the vehicle for a weapon but none was found. I made contact with the complainant who was hysterical from her fear of the suspect. I spoke to the complainant and took statement from her and gave her Domestic packets. Dep Whitehead obtained statement from the suspect who was identified as Mr. Perrot.
(Emphasis added).
Deputy Whitehead took my statement. This is the official report of what he wrote:
I explained to the suspect that he was not under arrest and did not have to answer or tell me his side of the story. He was adamant and wanted to -He stated he tried calling her because his soon to be ex-wife (the complainant) called and left a message on his answering machine. Her line was busy. He drove here approx. 10 min prior to our arrival. He tried calling again by car phone - still busy. He walked up and knocked on the door stating nothing - no answer. Walked back to car and tried calling again. Still busy. He returned and knocked on the door a second time and said "Beth are you home?" and got no answer and walked down to the front of the bushes to look, the blinds were up but the lights were off - He stated again, "Beth." Walked back to the car and dialed her number again - Got a busy signal and pulled out. That's when he was stopped at the entrance of the parking lot.
Elizabeth had set me up and I could have easily been killed by an overzealous, trigger happy cop that night. Both me and my car were searched and no gun was found. Elizabeth had lied and made a false police report. Again!
How damn dumb can Elizabeth get?
Turns out, a lot dumber.
In 2018 I deposed Elizabeth George in preparation for my upcoming civil commitment trial. She was now known as Elizabeth Baker. I questioned her concerning this March 26, 1993 incident. My intent was simply to get Elizabeth to admit that she called police and made a false report and lied when she told police I had a gun. Not surprising, Elizabeth started lying in that deposition. When Elizabeth started lying during the deposition, I allowed Elizabeth to dig herself into a hole as she continued to make up false allegations. Read how that 2018 deposition questioning went:
MR. PERROT: Did you ever call the police on me and said I had a gun?
ELIZABETH BAKER: Yes. Because you did.
MR. PERROT: And what date did that occur?
ELIZABETH BAKER: I don't remember the date.
MR. PERROT: March 26, 1993, does that sound about right?
ELIZABETH BAKER: Okay. Was that when you tried to break into my apartment and kill me? Maybe you remember that better than I.
MR. PERROT: I don't know, was it?
ELIZABETH BAKER: That must have been the date.
MR. PERROT: You called the police and said I had a gun?
ELIZABETH BAKER: You did.
MR. PERROT: Did the police find a gun?
ELIZABETH BAKER: I would assume, they got there and got you out of my apartment.
(Emphasis added).
Elizabeth had just falsely accused me of armed burglary and attempted murder with a firearm. Talk about lying under oath! AGAIN!
Not only did Elizabeth just make up additional false allegations, these new false allegations did not even match her old false allegations and what she originally told police which was also a lie.
Elizabeth knew when I was questioning her that that was not what happened. Apparently she never figured I would have the police report from that night which would show she had just lied under oath. Again. Of course I said nothing to her about having that police report or that she had just lied under oath again.
If that wasn't enough, after I deposed Elizabeth and she accused me of breaking into her apartment and trying to kill her, Assistant State Attorney Kendall Davidson sent me the same police report from that night which, of course, I already had. Davidson knew that Elizabeth was lying when I deposed her but Davidson sat there and knowingly allowed her to make up false allegations and lie under oath and never said a word.
Elizabeth George, AKA Elizabeth Baker is delusional. If you still have your doubts, continue reading.
April 9, 1993
On April 9, 1993 Elizabeth and I were divorced.
April 11, 1993
On April 11, 1993 Elizabeth called the Manatee County Sheriffs Department and reported that I was stalking her. The official police report written by deputy B. Smith states: "Elizabeth alleges that Gary has been harassing her verbally over the phone and has also came to her residence leaving notes and messages."
Deputy Smith also wrote in his report: "INVESTIGATION: I interviewed the victim. She stated she had the ex-husband taped making threats of violence to her."
Deputy Smith asked Elizabeth to produce the notes and messages. Elizabeth could not produce any notes or messages. The Deputy asked Elizabeth to produce the tape recording where I made these threats of violence to her. Elizabeth could not produce any such tape, claiming the tape was blank. Not surprising, Elizabeth told deputy Smith she did not want to press charges. The reason is clear: Elizabeth was lying; falsely accusing me of stalking her.
May 7, 1993
On May 7, 1993 Elizabeth called the Manatee County Sheriff’s Department on me, yet again. This time Elizabeth reported that from April 9, 1993 through May 7, 1993 I had been calling her and threatening to kill her over the phone. The police report stated specifically that
W/F Elizabeth Perrot stated that her ex-husband w/m Gary Perrot has been threatening her life and to take her child away from her. Subject has in the past arrived at her home and told her he had a weapon and would kill her. Phone calls continue.
(Emphasis added).
Note here that the past weapon allegation was found to be false. See March 26, 1993 incident above. Moreover, there was no allegation in any police report from March 26, 1993 that I was going to kill Elizabeth.
Elizabeth turned over to deputies three cassette answering machine tapes which she said contained all these threats to kill her. There was just one problem: Elizabeth was lying and falsely accusing me, yet again.
The three tapes were turned over to the State Attorney. Assistant State Attorney Eduardo Brodsky was assigned to the case. Assistant State Attorney Brodsky, in declining to file charges against me, wrote as follows:
I listened to most of the three answering machine tapes consisting of the defendant leaving messages and the defendant being wrongfully recorded as he engages in conversation with the victim. The anger between them stems from their split up and imminent divorce and concerns over the custody and visitation with their daughter.
One tape consisted of a very lengthy conversation between themselves. She willingly spoke to him at length and told him she was not recording the call when he asked. The other tapes consisted of calls where he wanted to speak to her. She continually refused to answer despite his pleas for her to speak to him. He wanted to ask questions, engage in what he called serious conversation, and discuss seeing his daughter. Not only do I not believe filing charges is appropriate in this very tragic period in the defendant's life - the calls do not rise to the level of criminal offenses. As such, no charges are appropriate.
(Emphasis added).
As can be seen, I made no threats whatsoever to Elizabeth. I did not threaten her or threaten to kill her. Further, it is clear it was Elizabeth who committed the crime by wrongfully recording me! At the time it was against the law in Florida to record someone without their consent. Manatee Sheriff's Deputies contacted me and wanted to know if I wanted to file charges against Elizabeth for illegally recording my conversations. Deputies said it was a "slam-dunk case" as they already had the evidence and Elizabeth admitted to recording me. I declined to press charges against Elizabeth as I was not willing to put the mother of my daughter in prison.
Elizabeth should remember that it's better to be thought of as a fool than to open her mouth and remove all doubt.
June 8, 1993
On June 8, 1993 I completed a restraining order application against Elizabeth. It was based upon an incident that occurred on May 29, 1993 when Elizabeth came to my house demanding her child support payment which I did not yet have. When Elizabeth discovered I did not have her support payment she threatened to kill me and slammed the door on my arm. As she was leaving she kicked the fender of my Camaro causing over $260 in damage. I attached the estimates to repair the damage to the application. I also asserted that she battered me on at least three previous occasions, ran my foot over with her car in October of 1992, had been repeatedly driving by my house, and that her aunt Peggy threatened to hire a hit man to kill me.
My parents also completed a statement which I attached to the application for a restraining order. In that statement my mother wrote:
We've had to hold our temper on more than one occasion when Beth has threatened to kill Gary. Once was going to be with a board while he was sleeping. They weren't arguing or anything at the time. She (Beth) also made the remark when we lived on 17th Ave and when we were at their house that if Gary ever did anything to her, she'd holler rape and fix him good.
My parents lived on 17th Ave in Bradenton, Florida between October 21, 1987 and March 23, 1990. This statement, made by Elizabeth to my parents and when it was made, is significant as Elizabeth would later accuse me of raping her in March, 1993, only after prosecutors would contact her in an unrelated case and feed her facts and information which would allow Elizabeth to lie and manufacture her false allegations of rape against me.
June 8, 1993
On June 8, 1993 Elizabeth also went to the courthouse and completed an application for a restraining order. In support, she goes all the way back to her allegations beginning in April, 1993 and uses them again in her application. These are the same allegations that have been shown to be false.
The reason Elizabeth filed for a restraining order is because my daughter, Heather, came to me and ask me what a "doobie" was. Heather thought the word was cute.
I asked Heather where she heard that word. Heather told me that her mother (Elizabeth) and Marcia Colyar were "smoking" and Elizabeth told Marcia to give her a hit off the doobie. I told my daughter that it was just her mother and Marcia smoking a cigarette and nothing more. I then called Elizabeth and told Beth that if I ever heard that she was smoking marijuana or doing any other kind of drugs in front of Heather again that I would make one phone call and it would be Heather who would suffer in the long run because I would have HRS take Heather from her for being an unfit mother.
Elizabeth actually stated in her application for the restraining order, "Gary has threatened to call HRS so they would take Heather from me because he says I am unfit as a mother." Of course Elizabeth never mentioned the part about her doing drugs in front of our little girl.
Something that was really interesting that Elizabeth put in her application was the fact that she admitted to calling me on the day she let the March 10, 1993 restraining order voluntarily expire, (which was March 26, 1993-see above). She now claims we spoke by phone and that I then drove over and she called 911. She never mentioned I had a gun like she asserted on March 26th. She does acknowledge that I later called her and claimed she had set me up.
The court granted Elizabeth's request for a restraining order making it good for only one year. If there was no problems during that year the restraining order would expire. However, if there were problems the judge would make the restraining order permanent. Significantly I was only prohibited from having contact with Elizabeth. I was not prohibited from having contact with my daughter, Heather.
I bet you simply cannot guess what Elizabeth eventually did.
June 13, 1993 to January 24, 1994
On June 13, 1993 I was arrested and remained in jail on something totally unrelated to Elizabeth George. I cover this in Stratagems of the Devil.
Between June 13, 1993 and January 24, 1994 while I was in jail I wrote numerous letters to my daughter Heather and sent her numerous cards including July 4th Halloween,
Thanksgiving and Christmas cards. Elizabeth would take those cards and letters and tear them up into very small pieces, place them in an envelope, and mail them back to me. You simply cannot imagine how this made me feel. Not towards Elizabeth, but at the fact that I felt that my daughter would think that I did not love her and did not want anything to do with her; she was simply not getting my cards and letters because of Elizabeth.
June 17, 1993
On June 17, 1993 I called collect from the Manatee County Jail to speak to my daughter, Heather. This so upset Elizabeth that she filed an affidavit stating that I violated the restraining order by calling my daughter. From there Elizabeth called the Manatee County Sheriffs Office and said that I called her and threatened her. There was just one problem. The calls from the county jail were recorded. Elizabeth could produce no evidence that I threatened her.
The case went to court and the judge modified the restraining order making it so that I could have "no contact with Elizabeth by phone, letter or third person." Apparently Beth was afraid that I would talk to my daughter and have my daughter tell Beth something.
August 13, 1993
On August 13, 1993 Elizabeth wrote me a letter. She wrote in pertinent part: "Heather will never see you again. That is something I will be sure of. I will use every available means of the law to keep you away from us and you know I have the strength to do it...leave Heather alone."
November 22, 1993
On November 22, 1993 Elizabeth called the Manatee County Sheriff's Department yet again. This time she reported that my 1992 Camaro was stolen. Elizabeth completed a sworn affidavit stating that she drove my Camaro on June 1, 1993 and parked it in the driveway of my home.
Significantly, the only way Elizabeth could have driven my Camaro is if I had given her the keys. Elizabeth went on to state that on September 1, 1993 she discovered the Camaro gone and she believed the vehicle to be stolen and she was not reporting it as stolen for purposes of fraud.
A subsequent narrative completed by Detective Davis of the Bradenton Police Department stated that upon further investigation Davis determined that "the vehicle was not stolen it had been turned into Ford Motor Credit Company. Case Closed- Unf."
In other words Elizabeth had lied, yet again. The car was not stolen and her claims that it was were "Unf." = unfounded.
As a side note to this incident Elizabeth testified, under oath, during my criminal trial proceedings in 1996 that after I raped her in March, 1993 she was never again at my house. Yet pursuant to her own sworn affidavit she was there on June 1, 1993 and drove my Camaro. She could not be that afraid of me as she claims if she had to get the keys from me in order to drive the Camaro and park it in my driveway.
April 24, 1994
On April 24, 1994 Elizabeth called the Manatee County Sheriff's Department and made a report of "criminal mischief' which occurred on April 23, 1994 at 9:30 pm. The official report, written by deputy Field states:
On the above date and time the lighting fixture was ripped down from the ceiling outside the apartment. I listed a related case number which is in reference to a violation of an injunction because the complainant has been having problems with an ex-husband. Also unknown white male in a white car has been seen around the complainant's home and car but the complainant has no description of either the white male or the car. I listed the suspect as other.
(Emphasis added).
Law enforcement took no action on this complaint.
April 25, 1994
The restraining order that Elizabeth took out against me on June 8, 1993 was to expire on June 7, 1994 if there was no violation. But the expiration of that restraining order was not to be. Elizabeth would make sure of that.
Remember what Elizabeth wrote to me in her August 13, 1993 letter? "Heather will never see you again. That is something I will be sure of. I will use every available means of the law to keep you away from us and you know I have the strength to do it ... leave Heather alone."
On April 25, 1994 Elizabeth signed a sworn affidavit. In it she stated, under oath:
On Thursday, April 21, 1994 at 3:45 pm, Gary called me at my place of employment and said, 'Meet me at the Southern Kettle Restaurant at 6:00 pm or else." I replied- "Are you nuts." He then hung up. On Friday- 4/22/94 at approx. 10:30 pm my door at home was beaten on by an unknown person and two hours later someone tried to vandalize my car causing my alarm to go off. On Saturday, 4/23/94 - The outside light at my apartment was taken apart leaving my doorway dark. I believe that my ex-husband is responsible.
When I was served with Elizabeth's affidavit and notice to appear I rolled my eyes so far back into my head I could actually see myself thinking. Let me be clear: I did not call Elizabeth, I went nowhere near where she lived, and I was actually seeing a woman named Juanita Meek at the time. Meek would later accuse me of raping her.
I went to court on May 20, 1994 to defend Elizabeth's false charges. Elizabeth could produce no supporting evidence where I had knocked on her door, set off her car alarm, or tried to vandalize her car. The incidents simply never occurred - just like the phone call never occurred.
But the trial came down to the phone call. At the time the call was made I was at my parents' house, in the bathroom, taking a shower. Both my parents testified at my trial. They testified that they had no portable phone, testified I had no way to make that phone call, and testified that I made no phone calls while there. My mother also testified about a conversation she had with Susan Malucci, one of my attorneys:
BETTY PERROT: It was outside the courthouse and Ms. Malucci said that she agreed with Mark Lipinski (my other attorney) that Gary should, when he was released from jail, that he should leave the county because of his ex-wife. Elizabeth was out to get him and he should leave the county. In fact, her exact words were, "He shouldn't let the sun set on his ass [in Manatee County] the day he gets out."
I even had my probation officer, Bill High, testify against Elizabeth. Mr. High told the court that Elizabeth had repeatedly called him and indicated that she is extremely fearful of me and "concerned about where you are and what you are doing."
Why would Elizabeth be extremely fearful of me when it's been demonstrated that all the previous complaints she made against me where unfounded? And why would Elizabeth be concerned about where I was and what I was doing? I then asked Mr. High:
MR. PERROT: Would you consider or did you indicate to me that Ms. George was a vindictive person?
BILL HIGH: Actually, she's even indicated to me that there's a vindictive side to herself.
Elizabeth also testified during that hearing. The significant questioning was done by the prosecutor and surrounded the phone call I allegedly made to her:
PROSECUTOR: Are you afraid of Mr. Perrot?
ELIZABETH GEORGE: Very.
PROSECUTOR: Why are you afraid of Mr. Perrot?
ELIZABETH GEORGE: Mr. Perrot has threatened to kill me.
PROSECUTOR: And did you say anything to him.
ELIZABETH GEORGE: I said, are you nuts.
PROSECUTOR: And then what happened?
ELIZABETH GEORGE: He hung up the phone.
(Emphasis added).
Notice how that line of questioning by the prosecutor and Elizabeth's answers do not match what Elizabeth wrote in her affidavit. Elizabeth claimed in her affidavit that I said, "Meet me at the Southern Kettle Restaurant at 6:00 pm tonight or else." Elizabeth said nothing in her affidavit about me threatening to kill her. She then wrote that she said, "Are you nuts" and I then hung up the phone. Thus, where did this threat to kill come from?
On cross-examination I established that there was no damage to Elizabeth's car and she had no idea who may have been knocking on her door or even what set off her car alarm. I also established that Elizabeth never checked with the maintenance department of her apartment complex to see if they had been working on the light. I also got her to admit that she was assuming all her problems were caused by me. I then asked her the following question:
MR. PERROT: When was the last time you actually spoke to me?
ELIZABETH GEORGE: I believe it was the last time we were in court.
MR. PERROT: Which was when?
ELIZABETH GEORGE: January of 94.
(Emphasis added).
After Elizabeth answered she realized she had been had and had been caught in a lie, and more than one lie at that, when she stated in her affidavit that I spoke to her on April 21, 1994.
Elizabeth jumped up and tried to explain her way out of her answer by claiming that I had confused her. I told the court that if the last time Elizabeth actually spoke to me was in January of 1994 while in court then she could not have spoken to me on April 21, 1994 as she claimed in her affidavit. I then asked her:
MR. PERROT: Do you receive any harassing phone calls at your apartment from the defendant?
ELIZABETH GEORGE: No.
(Emphasis added).
Read that again. Elizabeth just acknowledged that I had not called her at her home and harassed her. Elizabeth just admitted, under oath, that I never called her and harassed her as she previously claimed that I had in all those other police reports.
Unfortunately the judge found me guilty of calling Beth at her workplace. Sentencing was held on May 25, 1994. Elizabeth testified at my sentencing as follows:
ELIZABETH GEORGE: In the course of the last year I have had my home phone number changed to protect me from Mr. Perrot 's many abusive phone calls at all hours of the day and night.
I have been in this courtroom before in January of this year (1994) to file charges when Mr. Perrot has broken the standing restraining order that I have had since January of 1993.
I have not sought child support from him nor do I intend to because, Your Honor, I want nothing from this man other than to be left in peace, to raise my daughter and go on with my life.
I would ask that Your Honor would help me in this endeavor by helping to enforce the law so that my daughter and I will not have to live with continuous fear of this man.
(Emphasis added).
Elizabeth just lied, once again, to the court. She never obtained a restraining order against me in January of 1993. Further, Elizabeth just testified five days earlier that I had not been calling and harassing her at her residence. She now told the court that I had been calling her so much and often at her apartment that she had to have her number changed.
Elizabeth also lied to the court when she testified she had not sought child support from me and did not intend to. I had been paying child support up until May, 1993 when I was arrested in June and had the receipts, made out by Elizabeth George herself to prove it. Elizabeth then actually went down and filed paperwork to hold me in contempt for not paying support.
And here's a question for you - If Elizabeth just wanted to be left alone and live in peace as she told the judge then why did she, all of a sudden, claim that I raped her in March of 1993 and so testify against me when I was charged with raping Juanita Meek?
I will tell you why.
Elizabeth was lying once again and only claimed she was raped after prosecutors contacted her and briefed her on what Juanita Meek asserted I did to her.
Believing Elizabeth, the judge then sentenced me to six months probation and 90 days in the county jail on the road gang. Elizabeth did an excellent job of manipulating the system and the judge.
Early to bed and early to rise made Elizabeth George sneaky and full of lies. I am sure you understand when I say that, by this point, Elizabeth George had become a festering boil upon my ass. But temper is the one thing you cannot get rid of by losing it. So I kept my mouth shut and went to jail like a good little boy.
But wait! There's more!
Elizabeth just couldn't wait. She practically ran out of that courtroom and went directly to the clerk of court and completed and filed a motion to make the restraining order permanent. She claimed that I was convicted of breaking the present temporary restraining order by phoning her and threatening her in spite of the fact that there were no threats made to her. The court then granted that motion and the restraining order was made permanent.
What could I do? I was in jail serving the sentence for violating the temporary restraining order.
For more examples of Elizabeth's shenanigans you will have to wait for Stratagems of the Devil. Believe me there are many, many more.
